Predicting base Engine Vibrations using Flexible Multi Body Dynamics Simulation Paper No.: 2023-JL-03 Section Research Papers

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Pranay Sharma
Nikhil Rao
Rentong Wang
Pravin Kakde

Abstract

Predicting the vibratory response of a base engine is appealing as it can speed up the engine development cycle and cut down testing cost. However, there are concerns regarding predictability of base engine vibration simulation models due to various factors. This study attempts to investigate this predictability and gives more insights on what factors can affect it. In the presented work, the vibratory response of a base engine is predicted through a flexible Multi Body Dynamics simulation. Cylinder pressure excitation on the cylinder head and pistons, and reciprocating inertia excitation, are considered as inputs in this flexible Multi Body Dynamics simulation. Effects arising from overhead moving components and gear train, have been excluded from this study. The predicted vibratory response of the base engine at particular locations, is compared with the vibratory response as measured using accelerometers mounted at those locations, during testing. A reasonable level of correlation can be seen between simulation and testing. Measures that can be taken to improve this correlation are also discussed.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biography

Pranay Sharma, Cummins Technical Center India, Cummins Inc.

Corresponding Author: Mr. Pranay Sharma, Engineer, Cummins Technical Center India, Cummins Inc., Gandhi Bhavan Rd, Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud, Pune, Maharashtra 411038 Email: pranay.sharma@cummins.com

How to Cite
Sharma, P., Nikhil Rao, Rentong Wang, & Pravin Kakde. (2023). Predicting base Engine Vibrations using Flexible Multi Body Dynamics Simulation: Paper No.: 2023-JL-03. ARAI Journal of Mobility Technology, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.37285/ajmt.3.4.3

References

  1. Meirovitch, L. and Parker, R.G., Fundamentals of vibrations, Appl. Mech. Rev., 2001, 54(6): B100-B101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1421112
  2. Seshu, P., Substructuring and component mode synthesis, Shock and Vibration, 1997, 4(3): 199-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/1997/147513
  3. Craig Jr, R.R. and Bampton, M.C., Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses, AIAA journal, 1968, 6(7): 1313-1319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4741
  4. Wilson, W.K. and Wilson, W.K., Practical solution of torsional vibration problems: with examples from marine, electrical, aeronautical, and automobile engineering practice, 1956, Vol. 2, Springer, New York, NY, USA.
  5. Nestorides, E.J., A handbook on torsional vibration, 1958, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  6. Den Hartog, J., Mechanical Vibrations, 1956, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.
  7. Richards, C.M. and Singh, R., Characterization of rubber isolator nonlinearities in the context of single-and multi-degree-of-freedom experimental systems, Journal of Sound and vibration, 2001, 247(5): 807-834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3759
  8. Bracewell, R.N. and Bracewell, R.N., The Fourier transform and its applications, 1986, Vol. 31999, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.
  9. Bracewell, R.N., The fourier transform, Scientific American, 1989, 260(6): 86-95.
  10. Ro̸nnedal, P. and Nielsen, H.B., Firing Order Selection in Relation to Vibration Aspects, Proceedings of Internal Combustion Engine Division Spring Technical Conference, Salzburg, Austria, 2003, 36789: 311-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/ices2003-0603
  11. Uicker, J.J., Pennock, G.R., Shigley, J.E. and Mccarthy, J.M., Theory of machines and mechanisms, 2003, Vol. 768, Oxford University Press. New York, NY, USA.