On Using Kriging Response Surface Method for EV Battery Pack Structural Response Prediction and Mass Optimization

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Deepak Sreedhar Kanakandath
Sankha Subhra Jana
Arunkumar Ramakrishnan

Abstract

Structural response of battery packs in electric vehicles when subjected to road loads is an important factor that decides its performance and life during normal operation. In this paper a kriging response surface model is built using a Design of Experiment (DOE) run dataset to predict structural response and global modal frequency metrics of the battery pack. Using this Response Surface Model (RSM), we can rapidly optimize the battery pack design with respect to structural response and achieve significant mass reduction. This method reduces turnaround times for design optimization in early stages of battery pack design.


Keywords: Battery pack, Random vibration response, Kriging method, MDO, Optimization, RESS, Electric Vehicle, Battery pack, Multi-disciplinary optimisation, Mass optimisation, Response surface model, Automotive, CAE, Finite element method

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Deepak Sreedhar Kanakandath, Sankha Subhra Jana, & Arunkumar Ramakrishnan. (2022). On Using Kriging Response Surface Method for EV Battery Pack Structural Response Prediction and Mass Optimization. ARAI Journal of Mobility Technology, 2(2), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.37285/ajmt.1.2.8

References

  1. G. Kjell and J. F. Lang, "Comparing different vibration tests proposed for li-ion batteries with vibration measurement in an electric vehicle," 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27), Barcelona, 2013, pp. 1- 11.doi:10.1109/EVS.2013.6914869 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6914869&isnumber=6914705
  2. Surface vehicle recommended practice, “SAE standard J2380 - Vibration testing of Electric Vehicle Batteries”, issued 1998-01, revised 2013- 12, Superseding J2380 MAR2009 https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/J2380_201312/
  3. USABC Electric Vehicle Battery Test Procedures Manual, Revision 2, January 1996. Report No.DOE/ID-10479, Rev. 2. http://avt.inl.gov/energy_storage_lib.shtml
  4. Hooper, James & Marco, James. (2014). Characterizing the in-vehicle vibration inputs to the high voltage battery of an electric vehicle. Journal of Power Sources. 245. 510-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.150
  5. Schudt, J., Kodali, R., Shah, M., and Babiak, G., "Virtual Road Load Data Acquisition in Practice at General Motors," SAE Technical Paper 2011- 01-0025, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0025.
  6. Martin, J. and Simpson, T., "On Using Kriging Models as Probabilistic Models in Design," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0430, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-0430.
  7. Zhaoyan Lv, Zhenzhou Lu, Pan Wang, A new learning function for Kriging and its applications to solve reliability problems in engineering, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Volume 70, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1182-1197, ISSN 0898-1221, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2015.07.004
  8. Kachnowski, B. and Fu, Y., "Experience with Response Surface Methods for Occupant Restraint System Design," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01- 1306, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-1306
  9. Dong H, Song B, Wang P. Kriging-based optimization design for a new style shell with black box constraints. Journal of Algorithms & Computational Technology. September 2017:234- 245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748301817709601
  10. Giunta, A. & Wojtkiewicz, Steven & Eldred, Michael. (2003). Overview of modern design of experiments methods for computational simulations. AIAA. 0649. 10.2514/6.2003-649. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2003-649